Music Tech Week 7
The focus of week seven was assessment and using technology
to be professionally productive and organized. I found the readings and activities
this week to be interesting and I can see that information I learned this week
will help me, especially with organization and communication.
The assessment section of the reading reinforced my thoughts
regarding assessment, especially where Bauer (2014) discusses the Mid-continent
Research for Education and Learning statements that feedback should be
corrective in nature, timely, be specific to criterion, and that students
should be able to provide some of their own feedback. These are all great ideas for making sure
that feedback is productive and helpful to the students.
In music, sometimes students do not understand the feedback
that is being given by the teacher. Feedback
like “the flutes are out of tune” or “the trombones are playing the wrong notes”
does not give the students much information with which to correct their
errors. Teachers should be specific in
their corrections and should tell students what they should do, not to stop doing
something incorrectly. Feedback like “flutes
listen to each other and try to match pitch” or “if you’re not sure if it’s in
tune pull the head joint out and see if it sounds better, if not, push it back
in further than it was before” or “trombones E natural is second position”
gives the students specific information that they can use to make
corrections.
Feedback should be timely.
If a teacher does not correct students in a timely manner, students
might not realize they are making mistakes and will continue to make and learn
those mistakes thinking they are correct.
Music teachers are able to give feedback almost instantly during
rehearsals and they should offer feedback quickly to students so that they do
not learn mistakes. There is a delicate
balance between correcting errors and correcting students every single time
there is an error. Teachers cannot
correct every error they hear and expect the flow of a rehearsal to go
well. Teachers must weigh the importance
of fixing errors against bogging the rehearsal down. Teachers should make an effort to give individual
feedback in as timely a manner as is reasonable while taking into consideration
the class as a whole.
Feedback should be specific to criterion. This allows students to think more clearly
about what they are receiving feedback about.
If students receive a grade on a project but do not know what they have
been graded on, they might think they got a good grade because the teacher likes
them or a bad grade because the teacher does not. This does not allow students to reflect upon
their learning, which is another important step in the learning process. Using rubrics can provide more information to
students about why they got the grade they did. Using criterion also makes grading much more
clear for the teacher. Instead of a
student getting an A on a playing test because they “sound good”, if a teacher has
criterion for rhythm, correct pitches, and steady tempo, the grade can more accurately
reflect the student’s performance.
The use of technology can help teachers stay organized and
increase professional productivity. This
week’s assignment involving Google tools like the calendar, newsletter, and
Google Forms opened my eyes to new ways of staying organized and communicating
with families. Technology also allows
teachers to grade assignments in a more efficient way than using traditional
pencil and paper assignments. Almost all
of the written work in my classes is done using paper and pencil and this can impact
grading because of not being able to read student writing and the large amount
of time it takes to read and grade papers for hundreds of students. Using Google Forms to create a test that
students can take electronically can eliminate the issue of not being able to
read student responses and using programs like Flubaroo can electronically
grade a massive amount of student work in a fraction of the time needed to traditionally
grade it. I also liked using the
newsletter template Google has in Google Drive because teachers can quickly
create a nice looking newsletter that can be distributed electronically to families. I currently use a paper newsletter that I send
home with students and sometimes students forget to give them to their families
so the families are not updated on events.
The use of an electronic newsletter would ensure that families with
accurate email addresses get the needed information.
Reference
Bauer, W. I. (2014). Music learning today: digital pedagogy for
creating, performing, and responding to music. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment